Lawyers and the Constitution: How Laissez Faire Came to the Supreme Court
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Laissez-faire versus Pareto∗
Consider two principles for social evaluation. The first, ‘laissez-faire’, says that mean-preserving redistribution away from laissez-faire incomes should be regarded as a social worsening. This principle captures a key aspect of liberal political philosophy. The second, weak Pareto, states that an increase in each individual’s disposable income should be regarded as a social improvement. We sh...
متن کاملOn the robustness of laissez-faire
This paper considers a model economy in which agents are privately informed about their type: their endowments of various goods and their preferences over these goods. While preference orderings over observable choices are allowed to be correlated with an agent’s private type, we assume that the planner/government is both uncertain about the nature of this joint distribution and unable to choos...
متن کاملThe Platform Economy and Natural Monopoly: regulating or laissez-faire?
The platform economy has been a hot issue all over the world, especially in china. The Chinese capital market has witnessed substantial cases of mergers and acquisitions among those platforms recent years. Three IT industry giants in China,BAT(Baidu,Alibaba,Tecent), are all developing towards gigantic system of various platforms through purchasing related small platforms or investing in some ne...
متن کاملSchooling the Supreme Court
Supreme Court Justices' uniform professional backgrounds have drawn increasing criticism. Yet it is unclear how diverse professional training would affect the Court's decisions. This Article offers the first empirical analysis of how Justices with diverse professional training vote: It examines a unique period when Justices with formal legal education sat with Justices who entered the professio...
متن کاملThe Supreme Court, Roe
It is no exaggeration to say that no U.S. Supreme Court opinion has been more misunderstood and has had its arguments more misrepresented in the public square than Roe v. Wade (1973). 1 There seems to be a widespread perception that Roe was a moderate opinion that does not support abortion on demand, i.e., unrestricted abortion for all nine months for virtually any reason. Even a philosopher of...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The University of Toronto Law Journal
سال: 1943
ISSN: 0042-0220
DOI: 10.2307/824529